Krugman's example on when scales matter. Besides when you need to find out how much weight you've gained over Christmas and New Year's. Basically, if you're looking at a tiny scale, a boom is fantastic, but on a larger (national) scale, not so much.
I dunno, I think this is intuitive, and he could have come up with an example that wouldn't confuse anybody. If you win $500, you're pumped (I'm assuming you aren't particularly rich; if you were, I have no idea why you'd waste time with my blog). If Bill Gates finds $500, he's meh. The graph he provides comparing Pennsylvania and North Dakota hides a little of this; the amount of endowments increases, but the percentage increase in resources is drastically higher in North Dakota. I don't know who would argue that the discovery of energy resources in North Dakota (only) would have a crazy impact on the US as a whole...
No comments:
Post a Comment